Copyright © 2025 by Steve K. Lloyd
All Rights Reserved
Hidden in the soil and even within seemingly perfect tubers lurk microscopic threats that can disfigure your dahlias. Crown gall and Leafy gall are two of the most vexing—and misunderstood—bacterial diseases in ornamental horticulture.
These distinctive symptoms are caused by bacteria, microscopic single-celled organisms—not viruses, which are even smaller infectious agents. Both of these bacterial diseases begin with pathogens residing in the soil. These soilborne bacteria then have a remarkable ability to hijack the plant's own cellular machinery, essentially redirecting its normal growth processes into abnormal, tumor-like structures.

Cauliflower, anyone? A dramatic example of leafy gall caused by Rhodococcus fascians (Antonio Toledo photo)
While gall diseases aren't exclusive to dahlias, as growers of this cherished flower we need to be aware that the same pathogens affecting many other ornamentals, like roses, chrysanthemums, or petunias, can also find a home in our dahlia gardens.
There is a lot of information online about dahlia diseases. Some of it is accurate and understandable, but much of it is incomplete or downright misleading. As an experienced dahlia grower and hybridizer with a curious mind and a scientific streak, I set out to learn all I could about crown gall and leafy gall, and I’d like to share what I learned with other gardeners.
This article brings together what scientists have learned about these diseases with practical insights for dahlia growers to recognize, prevent, and manage gall in their own gardens.
While popular gardening websites often cover the basics, this guide goes deeper, drawing on published scientific research and practical experience to give you a clearer picture of what's going on beneath the surface.
Scientific names and terminology that may be unfamiliar appear in bold type the first time they appear.
These words are included in the Glossary at the end of this article.
The Bacteria Behind Dahlia Galls: Agrobacterium and Rhodococcus
Although both crown gall and leafy gall present as abnormal growths, they are caused by different bacteria and behave quite differently in the plant. Understanding this distinction is key to effective management.
For instance, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the cause of crown gall, is described as a hemibiotroph , meaning it initially lives off living plant cells before eventually causing their death.
In contrast, Rhodococcus fascians, which causes leafy gall, is a biotrophic pathogen , deriving nutrients from living host cells without immediately killing them.
Crown Gall: The Root-Tumor Disease
Crown gall is caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a soil-dwelling bacterium that enters the plant through wounds, especially during propagation or transplanting.
Once inside, it transfers a segment of its DNA into the plant's cells, where it integrates into the plant genome (the complete set of genetic instructions in a plant's DNA) and permanently alters the growth pattern.
The result: round, tumor-like swellings ("galls") that typically form at the base of the stem or on tubers. These galls disrupt the flow of water and nutrients, potentially weakening or killing the plant.
More troubling for dahlia growers is the fact that infected tubers can carry the disease from one season to the next.

A dahlia clump with Crown gall caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Author's photo)
Leafy Gall: The Bud-Break Imposter
Leafy gall is caused by Rhodococcus fascians, a gram-positive bacterium that triggers a very different kind of growth disorder. "Gram-positive" refers to a characteristic way certain bacteria stain in a laboratory test due to their cell wall structure, a detail that helps scientists classify and understand them.
Instead of tumor-like swellings, Rhodococcus fascians causes excessive shoot proliferation, often looking like a tight cluster of distorted leaves emerging from the crown or along stems. These leafy galls are easily mistaken for natural bud breaks or basal shoot growth.
What makes R. fascians especially insidious is that it can live in a latent state within plant tissue, sometimes without causing any symptoms at all.
Under certain environmental or hormonal conditions, however, it becomes active and begins to reprogram the plant's growth using a blend of cytokinins (a class of powerful plant hormones that promote cell division) and other growth-modifying molecules.

This dahlia tuber shows clear signs of Leafy gall, caused by Rhodococcus fascians (Author's photo)
Understanding Gall Bacteria Names: Agrobacterium and Rhodococcus
The names of these gall-causing bacteria often provide clues to their nature and the diseases they cause.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens : " Agro- " hints at its agricultural relevance, while " tumefaciens " comes from Latin, meaning "tumor-forming," directly referring to the crown galls it induces.
-
Rhodococcus fascians : "Rhodo coccus" comes from Greek, meaning "rose-colored berry," referring to the bacterium's reddish colonies. "Fascians" is derived from the Latin "fascia," meaning a band or bundle, directly alluding to the "fasciation," or bundling of shoots, characteristic of the leafy galls it causes.

Although not all growth caused by Rhodococcus fascians exhibits reddish colonies, this dahlia infected by leafy gall does (Author's photo)
Mechanism of Gall Infection: How Bacteria Reprogram Plant Cells
Agrobacterium and Genetic Engineering
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is sometimes called "nature's genetic engineer" because of its unique ability to insert its own DNA into a plant's genome. In fact, scientists have leveraged this very mechanism in the laboratory to genetically modify crops, highlighting its biotechnological utility.
In the wild, however, this fascinating process results in the plant's cells undergoing unregulated division, leading to the formation of crown galls.
The transferred DNA (T-DNA) contains genes that essentially force the plant to produce specific growth hormones, such as auxins and cytokinins, thereby mimicking and disrupting the plant's own intricate hormonal balance.
This T-DNA also instructs the plant to create unusual compounds known as opines . These unique substances are not typically found in plants and serve as a specialized food source for the bacterium.
It's a highly evolved parasitic relationship, and once the bacterial DNA is integrated into the plant's genetic code, the plant is permanently altered.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens—crown gall—with a distorted lump that has formed on a dahlia tuber clump (Author's photo)
Rhodococcus and Hormonal Chaos
Unlike Agrobacterium, Rhodococcus fascians does not alter the plant genome directly. Instead, it relies on a sophisticated form of chemical warfare, releasing a blend of signaling molecules. These include cytokinins and possibly auxin-like compounds.
Together, these disrupt the plant's own delicate hormone balance. This hormonal imbalance then causes the plant to form distorted tissues, especially around the shoot meristems (the specialized regions of actively dividing cells where new growth, such as stems, leaves, and flowers, originates).
Scientific research also suggests that R. fascians may actively suppress the plant's natural defense responses through bacterial effector molecules.

Rhodococcus fascians—leafy gall—distorts the shoot meristem tissues. This often results in a mass sometimes described as “cauliflower” growth (Antonio Toledo photo)
Sources and Spread of Dahlia Gall Pathogens
Both Agrobacterium and Rhodococcus bacteria are primarily found in soil and can persist in the environment for varying periods, sometimes for years under favorable conditions, particularly when associated with plant remnants or undecomposed plant material.
They are most commonly introduced into your garden through:
Infected propagation materials (cuttings, tubers, and seeds): Both bacterial and viral diseases can spread through propagating material. For instance, Rhodococcus fascians (leafy gall) is known to be seed-borne in some hosts, as confirmed by multiple peer-reviewed studies. Dahlia Mosaic Virus (DMV) , a common viral threat to dahlias, can also be transmitted via seeds.
Contaminated soil or growing media: Pathogens can live in the soil and infect healthy plants growing there, making infested soil a common introduction point.
Contaminated tools or hands that have contacted infected plants: Routine gardening tasks like pruning, dividing, or handling can mechanically transfer bacteria from diseased to healthy plants.
Water sources like rain splash or irrigation runoff from nearby infected beds: Water can passively carry bacterial cells from diseased plants or contaminated soil, facilitating their spread to new areas.
It's worth noting that, unlike many plant viruses that rely on insect vectors like aphids for transmission, these bacterial gall pathogens are generally not known to be spread by insects.
While some laboratory experiments have shown aphids can carry Rhodococcus fascians, there is currently no evidence of this occurring significantly in greenhouse or field settings. Similarly, Agrobacterium tumefaciens is primarily spread through direct contact and wounds, not insects.
For Agrobacterium, infection often favors open wounds (such as tiny cracks from freezing temperatures, pinch sites on greenhouse plants, or the base of cuttings being rooted). Rhodococcus, however, can be more subtle. It can colonize the plant surface, living on the outside of the plant before entering through tiny pores called stomata (microscopic openings, primarily on leaves, that allow for gas exchange) or other microscopic injuries.
Once inside, both pathogens can survive within the plant with varying degrees of latency (meaning they can be present but not actively causing visible symptoms for a period).
Because gall diseases are known to be transferred by mechanical contact, such as by clippers or other tools used on multiple plants, commercially-farmed dahlia tubers have become a recognized source for infection.

Although this assortment offered in February features other bulbing ornamentals, by April store displays are filled with imported, Dutch-grown dahlia tubers (Author's photo)
These pre-packaged tubers are sold by the millions each spring in garden centers and big-box stores. They are grown by large factory farms in Europe, where every step of the growth, harvest, and packaging process is often highly mechanized.
Even with efforts to prevent transmission, current sanitation protocols in such large-scale processes cannot always prevent bacteria from spreading between plants. This means the contagion they carry is readily transmissible to gardens everywhere.
Dahlia Vulnerability: Propagation, Latency, and Environmental Triggers
Understanding why dahlias are susceptible to gall diseases empowers us to make smarter choices in our gardens. It's not just about what we can see; it's about the hidden vulnerabilities that make these plants a target.
Dahlias, like many other herbaceous ornamentals (plants with non-woody stems), face susceptibility in part because growers propagate them vegetatively. New plants often begin as cuttings or tubers rather than seeds.

This healthy-looking dahlia tuber clump will be divided into separate tubers, then stored over the winter for propagation the following season (Author's photo)
Each cut, nick, or bruise you make during dividing or planting creates a potential entry point for Agrobacterium, which needs these wounds to initiate infection. However, Rhodococcus, the cause of leafy gall, can infect plants even without obvious wounds, entering through microscopic pores or other subtle points of ingress.
Beyond these fundamental vulnerabilities, the insidious nature of gall diseases lies in their ability to remain hidden. Leafy gall, in particular, is notorious for its latency (the ability of the bacterium to be present in plant tissue without causing visible symptoms).
The Rhodococcus fascians bacterium can persist on or within plant tissues for extended periods, sometimes for as long as six months (even longer in woody plants) without showing any visible signs.
This means growers can unknowingly maintain infected plants. You might share or sell seemingly healthy tubers or cuttings. This hidden presence makes diagnosis challenging, as symptoms might only emerge well into the active growing season, or even the following year.
Dahlia tubers stored over winter, for example, may harbor bacteria in dormant tissues, remaining latent until spring.

Cases of Rhodococcus fascians bacterium like this present with obvious symptoms. However, dahlia tubers can be infected but appear normal (Author’s photo)
Environmental Cues for Symptom Expression
Environmental conditions during both the growing season and winter storage can strongly influence whether symptoms appear. While the bacteria might be present, certain factors significantly favor disease development and increase its severity. Moderately warm temperatures and high humidity, for instance, often encourage these pathogens.
The degree to which symptoms appear also depends on a plant's age, its specific variety or cultivar, and even the bacterial strain involved. This sensitivity to environmental cues means a latent infection might 'wake up' and become apparent only when conditions become favorable for the pathogen.
Researchers note that Rhodococcus fascians can survive for considerable periods at low temperatures. Even light-related genes and pathways tied to photomorphogenesis (the process by which plants alter their growth and development in response to light) may influence when symptoms appear.

Rhodococcus fascians—leafy gall—has triggered a proliferation of shoots from the meristem tissue on this dahlia stalk (Author's photo)
Risks During Winter Storage
Off-season storage of dahlia tubers also presents a critical period for vulnerability. Even dormant tubers can harbor the bacteria that cause gall diseases.
Poor storage conditions, especially when ventilation is insufficient or temperatures are too warm, can lead to tuber stress or microscopic wounds. These can potentially exacerbate the risk of infection taking hold or expressing symptoms once growth resumes.
Broad Host Range & Cross-Contamination
Finally, infected dahlias can easily transmit gall diseases to other herbaceous ornamentals , not just dahlias. Both Agrobacterium and Rhodococcus have exceptionally broad host ranges. They affect numerous species in various plant families, including many popular garden and nursery plants like chrysanthemums, petunias, lilies, and even certain vegetables.

Asiatic lilies, shown here growing near one of the author’s dahlia breeding gardens, are one of the many susceptible species for both Agrobacterium and Rhodococcus (Author's photo)
By the same token, dahlias can also become infected from pathogens that originate in other susceptible plants. Some types of plants, or even specific cultivars within a type, may also face higher risk. They act as either more effective "givers" or "receivers" of infection, depending on their inherent susceptibility and environmental factors.
Understanding these interactions helps you manage your entire garden ecosystem.
Diagnosing and Detecting Dahlia Gall
Spotting gall diseases can be tricky. Infected tubers and cuttings can carry the disease even when they're not yet showing visible signs of infection. This latency means symptoms might not appear until much later in the plant's growth cycle. However, once they do emerge, here’s what to look for:
Visual Signs
-
Crown gall: These appear as rounded, knobby growths, typically at the base of the stem or on the upper tuber necks. When fresh, they are often light green or cream-colored, but they can darken with age and become hard or corky in texture. These can sometimes be mistaken for harmless scar tissue or callus that forms after an injury.

Crown gall tumors range from tiny to enormous, and can appear anywhere on the tuber clump (Antonio Toledo photo)
Leafy gall: This presents as clusters of small, misshapen leaves emerging from the crown or along stems. They may look like a dense rosette or an unusual basal sprouting. These symptoms are easily mistaken for normal, vigorous new shoot growth, or even adventitious shoots (growth from unusual places) caused by environmental factors or plant growth regulators.
Judging from hundreds of questions posted on dahlia enthusiast’s groups on social media, it’s all too easy for growers to mistake leafy gall symptoms for “an over-achieving tuber.” Sometimes, perfectly normal growth emerging from several eyes on the same tuber is mistakenly branded as a sign of leafy gall. Visual diagnosis sometimes isn’t easy.

These dahlia tubers are showing multiple shoots originating from each growth point, because cuttings have been harvested for propagation. This is the normal growth reaction of a healthy tuber, rather than an expression of leafy gall infection (Author's photo)
Lab Tests
Visual inspection alone is often not enough for an accurate diagnosis. This is especially true for Rhodococcus fascians, where precise laboratory testing is crucial to distinguish pathogenic (disease-causing) strains from non-pathogenic rhodococci (common, harmless bacteria of the same genus that might live on your plants without causing issues).
Diagnostic labs employ sophisticated molecular techniques. They may use PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) , a method that amplifies tiny segments of bacterial DNA to detect the pathogen's unique genetic signature. This allows scientists to detect the presence of the bacteria even when symptoms are not visible.
Labs also use ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) , which uses antibodies to detect specific bacterial proteins. In some cases, labs also perform bioassays using indicator plants, where suspect plant tissue is inoculated onto a highly susceptible plant (like sweet pea) to see if it develops characteristic symptoms.

There were no visible signs of disease when this dahlia was planted. By the end of the season, Agrobacterium tumefaciens caused this distinctive tumor (Katie Conger photo)
Home Methods
One of the most troubling things about gall-infected dahlia tubers is that they often appear normal while in their dormant state, such as when they're sold in retail stores. It’s very common for a grower to plant these seemingly healthy tubers in their gardens or in containers, covering them with the recommended 4–6 inches of soil, and never see what happens when the tubers "wake up" and begin to generate new growth.
Often, the first obvious sign of trouble comes at the end of the growing season, when the tubers are lifted for division and winter storage. It is only then that the bulbous, cauliflower-like tumors of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the profusion of partially expanded buds characteristic of Rhodococcus fascians (which can appear as multiple small, often malformed shoots at the plant’s base) finally see the light of day.
For this reason alone, I have long made a practice to pre-sprout my tubers indoors a few weeks before my desired planting date. I bring them into growth in seed trays filled with damp peat moss, so I can observe their first shoots and examine them for signs of infection. Although gall won't always show at this early stage, it often does and catching it now, before the tubers are planted, can be an easy way to decrease my risk of infecting other plants in the garden.

These tubers have been “pre-sprouted” indoors early in the spring. Each shows a normal shoot, ready to grow into a new dahlia plant (Author's photo)
Preventing and Managing Dahlia Gall
Once a dahlia plant gets infected with gall, there's no cure. The damage is permanent. So, prevention is truly your best, and essentially your only, effective approach.
Sanitation
Sterilize cutting tools between plants: Tools like pruners, scissors, and even mower blades easily spread bacteria from an infected plant to healthy ones. You must disinfect them frequently.
Avoid planting dahlias in beds where gall-infected plants grew before: Both Agrobacterium and Rhodococcus can survive in the soil, especially if plant remnants are still there. While some studies suggest these bacteria persist for about two years, other research speculates they can remain viable in field soil for at least four or five years if conditions are favorable. Crop rotation or leaving the bed fallow for a season can help lower bacterial populations.
Discard soil used for dahlias known to have had gall infection: Since these bacteria can linger in soil, particularly with plant roots or debris, it's vital to remove and dispose of contaminated potting mix. For garden beds, rotating to non-susceptible plants or letting the soil rest for a season effectively "rests" the soil from dahlia cultivation.
Disinfect storage crates, benches, and propagation areas: Thoroughly clean and sanitize any surfaces that touch potentially infected plants—like pots, flats, benches, and storage crates. Use effective disinfectants such as bleach solutions or quaternary ammonium compounds (a class of chemical disinfectants known for their broad antimicrobial activity against bacteria, fungi, and viruses).

Tools used for dividing and propagating dahlias are a proven vector for transmission of bacterial and viral diseases that can infect dahlias (Author's photo)
A Note on Tool Transmission and Rhodococcus fascians
Dahlia growers seem unanimous in their opinion that proper sanitation of garden scissors and tuber-dividing tools is critical to help minimize the spread of gall.
However, a 2019 article by plant pathologist Melodie Putnam from Oregon State University suggests that, based on experimental results, R. fascians is not readily transmitted on cutting tools. That discovery indicates a nuance for this specific pathogen.
While proper tool cleaning remains a critical line of defense against the spread of many dahlia diseases, it may not be scientifically proven for some bacterial contagions.
For more on proper tool cleaning, and the relative effectiveness of bleach and other commonly-used cleaning chemicals, see my article “The Science of Sanitation: Protect Dahlias from Deadly Pathogens” on this website.
Propagation Practices
Source stock from small-scale growers: Many large factory farms use highly mechanized processes for growing, harvesting, and packaging. These methods provide no sanitation protocol to prevent transmission. While hand-processing offers no absolute guarantee of clean stock, a human eye examining the tubers can significantly lower the chances of acquiring infected propagation material.
Avoid reusing potting mix: Contaminated potting mix can harbor gall bacteria, becoming a source of infection for new plants. Always use fresh, sterilized potting mix for dahlias. For garden soil, completely replacing it isn't practical. Instead, some experts suggest letting beds lie fallow for a season or planting non-susceptible crops like certain vegetables or other ornamentals not known to host these specific gall bacteria.
Discard any tuber showing gall symptoms or unusual basal growth: Immediately remove any tuber with suspicious growths, like knobby crown galls. Also discard tubers showing abnormal basal growth (excessive, distorted shoot proliferation from the base, characteristic of leafy gall).

Abnormal basal growth—excessive, distorted shoot proliferation from the base—is characteristic of leafy gall (Author's photo)
Environmental Controls
Reduce overhead irrigation or splashing: Water splash, whether from overhead irrigation or heavy rain, is a known way for gall bacteria to spread from infected plants or contaminated soil to healthy ones. Minimizing splashing and ensuring good drainage on benches helps contain the spread.
While some growers in hot climates use sprinklers or misters to cool dahlia foliage, at least seven scientific papers point to "water splash" as a transmission mechanism for gall-causing bacteria in the garden.Minimize plant stress: Healthy, vigorous plants generally resist diseases better. Provide balanced nutrients through proper fertilization and ensure adequate spacing. This helps plants direct energy towards robust growth and natural defense mechanisms.

Dahlias grown in nutrient-rich soil with minimal pest pressure and proper irrigation are better prepared to resist pathogens from bacterial and viral diseases (Author's photo)
Discarding Infected Material
Once you identify infected plants, remove and destroy them and their tubers. Don't compost infected material; the bacteria can survive and persist, potentially reintroducing the pathogen to your garden.
Disposal methods vary, but common practices include burning infected material or double-bagging and discarding it with household trash. This destruction is crucial for preventing latent infections from persisting and creating a new source of inoculum (the infectious material, like bacteria, that can spread disease) in your growing area.

Normal-looking sprouts from these dahlia tubers indicate they are ready to grow into new plants, but they could still be infected with a bacterial or viral disease (Author’s photo)
Inspecting Dahlias for Gall: From Sprouting to Storage
I’ve already talked about pre-sprouting my tubers in early spring, so I can observe their earliest growth. I also monitor my plants closely throughout the growing season, looking for signs of pest pressure, viruses, and the tell-tale signs of leafy gall, which often appear as a profusion of leggy new shoots at a dahlia's base that may otherwise seem normal.
Another inspection opportunity, and arguably the best way to spot gall infection, comes when you lift tuber clumps for winter storage. Even before rinsing my clumps, I knock away some soil and examine each clump for suspect growths that might signal gall infection.

These freshly-dug dahlia tubers at first appeared to have an abundance of normal growth. They were found to have multiple shoots crowding from single growth points, which can be a leafy gall indicator. (Author's photo)
Since I divide in the fall, which allows me to store individual tubers instead of intact clumps, I always rinse freshly-dug tubers before separating them.
While rinsing tubers, it's common to use a strong stream from a garden hose, a process that inherently involves water splash. This inspection provides my best chance to recognize tubers with crown or leafy gall, letting me diagnose and dispose of them before they receive additional handling.
I balance this practice against the knowledge that irrigation water is one of many things that can spread bacterial diseases between dahlias. I am careful to rinse my clumps away from my growing areas, and direct the water where it is unlikely to come in contact with growing plants.
Final Thoughts on Dahlia Gall Management
Every spring, the social media groups that are popular with dahlia growers explode with photos and questions, all asking some version of “Is this gall?”
In fact, there are so many gall posts on the major growers’ groups that a casual reader might conclude gall diseases in dahlias are everywhere.
But just like some people don’t go to the doctor until they feel sick, nobody is posting photos of healthy tubers on Facebook saying “Look! Here’s another tuber without gall!”

“Is this gall?” Yes! Lumpy growths such as these are almost always indicative of Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection (Antonio Toledo photo)
Gall diseases in dahlias are uncommon but not rare. And while the prospect of bacterial infection can be intimidating, especially given its permanence, the good news is that both crown gall and leafy gall are manageable through vigilance and hygiene.
Ultimately, the fight against dahlia gall is won not with chemicals, but with knowledge. Understanding how these pathogens behave, recognizing their signs, and applying sound hygiene practices lets you defend your garden—and help protect the wider dahlia-growing community.
Glossary
Basal Growth: Excessive, distorted shoot proliferation from the base of the plant, characteristic of leafy gall.
Bacteria: Microscopic, single-celled organisms; some are plant pathogens that cause diseases like galls.
Biotroph/Biotrophic Pathogen: A type of pathogen that derives nutrients from living host cells without immediately killing them. Rhodococcus fascians is a biotrophic pathogen.
Crown Gall: A plant disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, resulting in round, tumor-like swellings, typically at the base of the stem or on tubers.
Cytokinins: A class of powerful plant hormones that primarily promote cell division and shoot growth. Rhodococcus fascians produces these to manipulate plant development.
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): A laboratory method that uses antibodies to detect specific proteins, such as those from plant pathogens.
Endophytic: Refers to a microorganism living within plant tissues. Rhodococcus fascians transitions to an endophytic phase inside the plant to cause disease.
Epiphytically/Epiphyte: Refers to a microorganism living on the surface of a plant without directly entering its tissues. Rhodococcus fascians often lives epiphytically before symptoms appear.
Genome: The complete set of genetic instructions (DNA) in an organism.
Gram-Positive: A classification of bacteria characterized by their thick cell walls, which retain a purple stain in a laboratory test (Gram stain). Rhodococcus fascians is a gram-positive bacterium.
Herbaceous Ornamentals: Plants with non-woody stems, often grown for their aesthetic appeal in gardens.
Hemibiotroph: A type of pathogen that initially lives off living plant cells but later causes their death. Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a hemibiotroph.
Inoculum: The infectious material (like bacteria or spores) that can spread disease.
Latency/Latent State: The ability of a pathogen to be present in plant tissue without causing visible symptoms for a period.
Leafy Gall: A plant disease caused by Rhodococcus fascians, resulting in excessive shoot proliferation that looks like a tight cluster of distorted leaves.
Multipartite Genome: A rare type of genome structure in bacteria that consists of more than one DNA molecule (e.g., multiple chromosomes or a chromosome plus large plasmids).
Neovascularization: The formation of new vascular tissues (like xylem and phloem) within an abnormal growth or tumor to supply it with water and nutrients.
Opines: Unusual compounds produced by plant cells under the influence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens's transferred DNA (T-DNA), which the bacterium uses as a food source.
Photomorphogenesis: The process by which plants alter their growth and development in response to light, mediated by light-sensitive photoreceptors.
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction): A laboratory method used to amplify (make many copies of) tiny segments of DNA, allowing scientists to detect the genetic signature of pathogens.
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (Quats): A class of chemical disinfectants known for their broad antimicrobial activity against bacteria, fungi, and viruses.
Shoot Meristems: Specialized regions of actively dividing cells in plants where new growth, such as stems, leaves, and flowers, originates.
Soilborne: Refers to pathogens that reside and spread through the soil.
Stomata: Microscopic pores, primarily on leaves, that allow for gas exchange between the plant and the atmosphere. Pathogens can sometimes enter through these openings.
T-DNA (Transferred DNA): A segment of DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens's tumor-inducing plasmid that is transferred into a plant's cells and integrates into its genome, altering its growth.
- Vegetative Propagation: A method of plant reproduction using plant parts like cuttings, tubers, or divisions, rather than seeds.

Rhodococcus fascians : Infected tubers exhibiting the "fasciation," or bundling of shoots, characteristic of the leafy galls it causes (Author's photo)
Suggested Reading
I reviewed about 35 published scientific articles as I prepared to write this post. Some are extremely technical and not reader-friendly to dahlia growers who, like me, aren’t scientists. I was delighted to find there is at least one scientist who can write content-rich, factual articles on complex subjects in a way that the rest of us can understand.
Melodie Putnam is the former Director of the Oregon State University Plant Clinic and has been working with plant gall diseases for more than 20 years. She was the featured guest on a 2021 episode of the Sustainable Flowers podcast which you can listen to here .
Although not written specifically about dahlias, I recommend the following articles for growers seeking additional information about gall diseases in general.
Putnam, M. L., & Miller, M. (2014). Is it crown gall or leafy gall? Digger February, 33-37.
Putnam, M. L., & Miller, M. L. (2007). Rhodococcus fascians in herbaceous perennials . Plant Disease, 91(9), 1064-1076.
Putnam, M. L. (2014). Demystifying Rhodococcus fascians . Digger February, 33-37.
Putnam, M. L. (2015). Crown Gall: Still Confounding Scientists and Growers Alike . GrowerTalks, 79(6) October.
Putnam, M. L. (2019). The Lowdown on Leafy Gall . GrowerTalks, 83(4) August.
Full Bibliography
This bibliography includes all peer-reviewed articles and authoritative texts that directly support the claims and conclusions presented in this article. The list is organized alphabetically for ease of reference.
Direct links are provided for all sources. Where a publication is behind a paywall, I have noted “Academic Paywall” for readers who may have access through a library or institution.
For readers interested in the specific research behind our discussions, this list provides complete citation details for locating the sources. The author has verified that every hyperlink actively points to the corresponding article as of August 2025.
Almeyda-Becerra, C. V. (2012). Incidence, Molecular Characterization, Genetic Diversity, and Serological Studies of Pararetroviruses Associated with Dahlia Spp . Washington State University. (Doctoral dissertation).
Bissa, S., & Bohra, A. (2011). Screening of Dahlia pinnata for its antimicrobial activity . Journal of Research in Biology, 1(1), 51-55.
Chopra, S., & Samuel, J. (2018). Co-Evolutionary relationship between plants and phytopathogens . Int. J. Res. Analytical Rev, 5(4), 1133-1151.
Cornelis, K., Ritsema, T., Nijsse, J., Holsters, M., Goethals, K., & Jaziri, M. (2001). The plant pathogen Rhodococcus fascians colonizes the exterior and interior of the aerial parts of plants . Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 14(5), 599-608.
Depuydt, S., Putnam, M., Holsters, M. & Vereecke, D. Rhodococcus fascians, an emerging threat for ornamental crops . Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology: advances and topical issues 5 (2008): 480-489.
Dolzblasz, A., Banasiak, A. & Vereecke, D. (2018). Neovascularization during leafy gall formation on Arabidopsis thaliana upon Rhodococcus fascians infection . Planta 247, 215–228. ACADEMIC PAYWALL
Flanagan, C. M., Crowell II, C. B., & Markelz, B. P. (2000). Scientific investigation of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens . (Bachelor of Science Thesis).
Goodner, B. W., Markelz, B. P., Flanagan, M. C., Crowell Jr, C. B., Racette, J. L., Schilling, B. A., ... & Grabowski, G. (1999). Combined genetic and physical map of the complex genome of Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Journal of bacteriology, 181(17), 5160-5166.
Hương, N. T., Lan, Đ. T., Thanh, D. T., Hiếu, H. V., & Thức, B. T. (2023). Study On Creating Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strains Harboring PkO2-PR1 Vector for Pr1 Gene Deletion In Verticillium dahliae . Tnu Journal Of Science And Technology, 228(09), 407-414. Please note that content from this source was interpreted and integrated based on an AI-generated English translation , as the original text was in Vietnamese. While efforts were made to ensure accuracy, subtle nuances of scientific meaning may be subject to linguistic interpretation.
Loper, J. E., & Kado, C. I. (1979). Host range conferred by the virulence-specifying plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Journal of Bacteriology, 139(2), 591-596.
Martins, O., de Luccas, B. & dos Santos, M. (2016). Subsídios técnicos para a elaboração de um plano de contingência para Rhodococcus fascians [“Technical support for developing a contingency plan for Rhodococcus fascians“.] Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento 315 / Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (Research and Development Bulletin 315 / Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology). Please note that content from this source was interpreted and integrated based on an AI-generated English translation , as the original text was in Portuguese. While efforts were made to ensure accuracy, subtle nuances of scientific meaning may be subject to linguistic interpretation.
Miller, H. N. (1975). Leaf, stem, crown, and root galls induced in chrysanthemum by Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Phytopathology, 65(7), 805-811.
Otani, Y., Chin, D. P., & Mii, M. (2013). Establishment of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation system in Dahlia . Plant Biotechnology, 30(2), 135-139.
Pahalawatta, V. (2007). Biological and Molecular Characterization of Dahlia Mosaic Caulimovirus. (Doctoral thesis).
Putnam, M. L., & Miller, M. (2014). Is it crown gall or leafy gall? Digger February, 33-37.
Putnam, M. L., & Miller, M. L. (2007). Rhodococcus fascians in herbaceous perennials . Plant Disease, 91(9), 1064-1076.
Putnam, M. L. (2014). Demystifying Rhodococcus fascians . Digger February, 33-37.
Putnam, M. L. (2015). Crown Gall: Still Confounding Scientists and Growers Alike . GrowerTalks, 79(6) October.
Putnam, M. L. (2019). The Lowdown on Leafy Gall . GrowerTalks, 83(4) August.
Ramesh, S. V., Yogindran, S., Gnanasekaran, P., Chakraborty, S., Winter, S., & Pappu, H. R. (2021). Virus and viroid-derived small RNAs as modulators of host gene expression: molecular insights into pathogenesis . Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 614231.
Ren, Z., Liao, Q., Karaboja, X., Barton, I. S., Schantz, E. G., Mejia-Santana, A., ... & Wang, X. (2022). Conformation and dynamic interactions of the multipartite genome in Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(6), e2115854119.
Rundqvist, L. (2024). Rhodococcus fascians: Pathogenicity, Plant Interaction and Survival in Soil . First cycle, G2E. Alnarp: SLU, Dept. of Plant Breeding (from 130101). Please note that content from this source was interpreted and integrated based on an AI-generated English translation , as the original text was in Swedish. While efforts were made to ensure accuracy, subtle nuances of scientific meaning may be subject to linguistic interpretation.
Serdani, M., Curtis, M., Miller, M. L., Kraus, J., & Putnam, M. L. (2013). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification and polymerase chain reaction methods for specific and rapid detection of Rhodococcus fascians . Plant disease, 97(4), 517-529.
Ullrich, C. I., & Aloni, R. (2000). Vascularization is a general requirement for growth of plant and animal tumours . Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(353), 1951-1960.
van Doorn, J., Hollinger, T. & Pham, P. (2006). Identificatie en beheersing van bacterieziekten in bolgewassen [“Identification and control of bacterial diseases in bulb crops.”] Please note that content from this source was interpreted and integrated based on an AI-generated English translation , as the original text was in Dutch. While efforts were made to ensure accuracy, subtle nuances of scientific meaning may be subject to linguistic interpretation.
van Zyl, F. G., Strijdom, B. W., & Staphorst, J. L. (1986). Susceptibility of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains to two agrocin-producing Agrobacterium strains . Applied and environmental microbiology, 52(2), 234-238.
Vlad, I., Vlad, M., & Vlad, I. (2017). Actual fitosanitary problems of cultivated dahlia plants and of tuberous roots stored over winter . Annals of the University of Oradea, Fascicle: Environmental Protection, Vol. XXIX.
Zhai, Y., Peng, H., Neff, M. M., & Pappu, H. R. (2020). Emerging molecular links between plant photomorphogenesis and virus resistance . Frontiers in plant science, 11, 920.
Zhai, Y., Gnanasekaran, P., & Pappu, H. R. (2021). Identification and characterization of plant-interacting targets of tomato spotted wilt virus silencing suppressor . Pathogens, 10(1), 27.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens : Remember that the Latin "tumefaciens" means "tumor-forming," directly referring to the crown galls it causes (Author's photo)
AI Collaboration Transparency
This article was created through a collaborative process between the author—a dahlia grower and educator—and an AI language model trained on scientific and botanical texts. The author guided the structure, tone, and emphasis of the article, and provided the scientific sources that form its foundation.
The author carefully reviewed every article at each stage to ensure factual accuracy, clarity, and accessibility.
The AI was used as a research and writing assistant, helping to summarize technical material, suggest phrasing, and—as part of a guided review process—link every substantive scientific statement, conclusion, and principle to one or more published, peer-reviewed source articles.
All content was shaped, reviewed, and refined by the author to ensure clarity and usefulness for readers interested in the science of dahlias.

There were no visible signs of infection when this dahlia was planted in May. When it was lifted in October, it clearly showed Rhodococcus fascians (Author's photo)
Intriguing Facts and Questions About Dahlia Gall
The world of plant pathogens is filled with fascinating details, some of which scientists are still actively exploring. Here are a few intriguing facts and questions from my research that might pique your curiosity, as they did mine:
-
Can Dahlias Fight Back? Beyond human intervention, some research suggests that dahlias might possess their own natural antimicrobial properties. Studies on Dahlia pinnata extracts from various plant parts (root, stem, leaf, flower) show antibacterial activity against several pathogens, including Agrobacterium tumefaciens. This raises an intriguing question: Could dahlias have inherent defenses against gall diseases?
(Source: Bissa, S., & Bohra, A. (2011). Screening of Dahlia pinnata for its antimicrobial activity . Journal of Research in Biology, 1(1), 51-55.)
-
Are Plant Tumors Like Human Cancers? Scientists have drawn fascinating analogies between solid tumor growth in animals (including humans) and plant tumors like crown galls. Both require a process called "neovascularization"—the formation of new vascular tissues—for sustained growth. Tumors that fail to induce this vascularization often remain small. Plant tumors even prompt the development of complex networks of water- and nutrient-conducting vessels, a sophisticated redirection of resources. This has led researchers to suggest plant tumors are excellent model systems for studying general principles of cancer pathogenesis.
(Source: Ullrich, C. I., & Aloni, R. (2000). Vascularization is a general requirement for growth of plant and animal tumours . Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(353), 1951-1960.)
-
Can Agrobacterium Infect Humans? While primarily known as a plant pathogen, Agrobacterium tumefaciens has been investigated as an opportunistic human pathogen. Over 50 cases of human infection have been reported, primarily in immunocompromised individuals, causing conditions like bacteremia and septicemia. The bacterium’s ability to grow readily at human body temperature (37°C) suggests an evolutionary adaptation for survival in a mammalian environment, and its DNA shows surprising homology to invasion proteins found in some human pathogens.
(Source: Flanagan, C. M., Crowell II, C. B., & Markelz, B. P. (2000). Scientific investigation of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens . (Bachelor of Science Thesis).)
-
How Complex Is a Bacterium's DNA? Agrobacterium tumefaciens boasts a surprisingly intricate multipartite genome , a rare trait among bacteria. It contains not just one, but two distinct chromosomes (one circular, one linear), along with two large plasmids (small, extra-chromosomal DNA molecules). Scientists have meticulously mapped how these multiple DNA molecules are organized, replicated, and segregated within the bacterial cell, revealing a fascinating level of cellular complexity.
(Sources: Goodner, B. W., Markelz, B. P., Flanagan, M. C., Crowell Jr, C. B., Racette, J. L., Schilling, B. A., ... & Grabowski, G. (1999). Combined genetic and physical map of the complex genome of Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Journal of bacteriology, 181(17), 5160-5166.
Ren, Z., et al. (2022). Conformation and dynamic interactions of the multipartite genome in Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(6), e2115854119.)
-
Can Plants Be Infected for Years Without Symptoms? The persistence of gall pathogens is remarkable. Some research suggests Rhodococcus fascians can survive in field soil for as long as four or five years under appropriate conditions. Even more surprisingly, it has been revived from ancient soil sediments in arctic ice, hinting at its adaptation for long-term survival in harsh environments.
(Source: Putnam, M. L., & Miller, M. L. (2007). Rhodococcus fascians in herbaceous perennials . Plant Disease, 91(9), 1064-1076
Rundqvist, L. (2024). Rhodococcus fascians: Pathogenicity, Plant Interaction and Survival in Soil . First cycle, G2E. Alnarp: SLU, Dept. of Plant Breeding (from 130101).)
-
Do Some Plant Viruses Hide in the Dahlia's Own DNA? Some dahlia mosaic viruses (specifically a strain called DMV-D10) don't just infect the plant externally; they can actually integrate their genetic material directly into the dahlia's own genome. This discovery challenged previous beliefs about how these viruses operate and has significant implications for diagnosis and management, as the viral genetic material becomes a permanent part of the plant's inherited traits.
(Source: Pahalawatta, V. (2007). Biological and Molecular Characterization of Dahlia Mosaic Caulimovirus . (Doctoral thesis).)
-
Can Plants "Recover" from Viral Disease? For some viral infections, plants can exhibit a phenomenon called "symptom recovery," where visible disease symptoms actually remit. This is often associated with the plant's own RNA silencing defense mechanism overpowering viral suppressors. While this isn't a "cure," it highlights the dynamic interplay between host and pathogen.
(Source: Ramesh, S. V., Yogindran, S., Gnanasekaran, P., Chakraborty, S., Winter, S., & Pappu, H. R. (2021).Virus and viroid-derived small RNAs as modulators of host gene expression: molecular insights into pathogenesis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 614231.)

A freshly-dug dahlia tuber clump with the distinctive fused shoots and disorganized growth of Rhodococcus fascians (Author's photo)
Digging Deeper: Areas for Future Study
Science has revealed much about gall diseases in dahlias (and other plants), but many questions are still unanswered. My extensive review of the scientific literature for this article turned up some fascinating material that was beyond its scope, but which I still found interesting and thought other curious readers might, as well.
Researchers continue to explore the complex interactions between dahlias and their bacterial invaders. Exploring these less-understood areas of study could lead to even more effective prevention and management strategies in the future.
According to the nearly 30 scientific papers I read while preparing this article, some areas of gall research have barely been studied. Here are some key areas where more scientific study is needed:
Understanding Rhodococcus fascians Life Cycle and Pathogenicity:
What triggers R. fascians to switch from its harmless surface-dwelling (epiphytic) phase to its disease-causing internal (endophytic) phase?
How exactly do the bacterium's virulence plasmids get lost during laboratory cultivation, affecting diagnostic results?
Is pathogenicity determined by the quantity of cytokinins R. fascians produces, or by unique types of cytokinins? Are there other, as yet unidentified, signaling substances involved?
Can specific factors like humidity, soil moisture, temperature, or other soil conditions be manipulated to inhibit R. fascians survival or symptom expression?
What specific mechanisms allow R. fascians to suppress a plant's natural defense responses, and how can these be counteracted?
How widespread is the genetic diversity within pathogenic Rhodococcus strains, and could some actually be different species?
The Nuances of Pathogen Survival and Spread:
How long can R. fascians truly survive in different soil types and at varying depths, especially in groundwater or under anaerobic conditions?
What role do factors like non-decomposed plant material, microbial competition, and soil pH play in the long-term persistence of R. fascians in the garden environment?
Can new strategies, like enhancing microbial activity in soil through organic amendments, effectively suppress gall bacteria?
Are there specific insect vectors that play an unknown role in the natural spread of these bacterial gall diseases in garden or field settings?
Dahlia's Intrinsic Defenses and Resistance:
Could the natural antimicrobial properties observed in some dahlia species be harnessed to develop inherent resistance against gall-causing bacteria?
Can we identify and leverage specific dahlia cultivars that exhibit natural resistance to crown gall or leafy gall, aiding in breeding efforts for more resilient plants?
Advanced Diagnostics and Detection:
Can faster, more accessible diagnostic tools be developed that accurately differentiate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Rhodococcus in a way that is reliable for growers?
How can we improve diagnostic accuracy for diseases that involve integrated viral genomes, like certain dahlia mosaic viruses, to distinguish them from other pathogens or even endogenous sequences within the plant?
Plant Tumor Biology and Comparison to Human Cancer:
How do plant tumors, particularly crown galls, induce the formation of complex new vascular networks to sustain their growth, and what signals drive this process?
Can plant tumor systems, which share surprising similarities with human cancers (e.g., neovascularization), serve as effective models for understanding general principles of cancer pathogenesis?